How Ukraine reset the tone with ‘Operation Spider Web’


Inside Olenya air base in Russia’s Arctic north on Sunday, Russian maintenance crews watched helplessly as Ukrainian drones swarmed their billion-dollar bomber fleet. Many of these drones were launched from wooden boxes smuggled across the border on at least seven trucks over the past 18 months (analysts are still poring over satellite data to piece the details together).

The numbers of ‘Operation Spider Web’ are wild:

  • 117 Ukrainian drones were involved
  • 41 Russian aircraft were targeted (per Ukrainian government sources)
  • The drones hit targets as far as 4,300 kilometres away from Russia’s border with Ukraine
  • And Ukrainian sources suggest one-third of Russia’s bomber fleet was badly damaged or destroyed

But here’s the kicker: the Ukrainian drones (which appear to have been modified from the type of consumer models that normally film weddings) cost ~$500 a pop whereas the Russian Tu-95MS and Tu-22M3 bombers they’re hunting come in somewhere between $40 million and $100 million each (estimates vary).

That’s about a 1:100,000 cost to damage ratio. Ukraine just proved you can cripple a major power’s air force for the price of a sensible family sedan.

So why does this matter right now?

For the “ceasefire” talks, this timing is no accident. A Russian delegation was on its way to Istanbul as Ukrainian drones were striking — just 48 hours after Moscow launched its own record-setting drone attack.

There’s two ways to read this:

  • both sides are flexing their military might to gain leverage before the negotiations, or;
  • neither side is serious about peace and won’t be for a while.

While Russia and Ukraine did agree late yesterday to repatriate the bodies of 6,000 dead soldiers and exchange POWs, there was no sign of any broader agreement to end the war, so the smart money’s on the latter explanation.

For Ukraine, the operation was both a PR win and a legitimate military feat. Many of the drones were made domestically, under wartime conditions, with supply chains under constant attack. Remember that Oval Office meeting between Presidents Zelenskyy and Trump? Well, this operation flips that script a bit, showing the world that Ukraine still has “cards to play”, and can innovate and adapt despite facing a richer and more powerful enemy.

For Putin, it’s a wake-up call that nowhere is safe — not even Siberia. With fighting still occurring inside Russia’s Kursk oblast, exact borders are getting blurrier, and apparently, wooden boxes on trucks can hide some nasty surprises. Intelligence analysts say Operation Spider Web demonstrates just how little control Russia has over its borders.

For defence chiefs around the world, why commission $50 million bombers when an enemy can take them out with something that costs less than an (admittedly overpriced) Dyson hairdryer?

Intrigue’s Take

Ukraine’s remarkable attack leaves us with (at least) three big questions:

First, how will Russia retaliate? Russia has already responded with a series of missile and drone strikes across Ukraine, but Putin has a bigger decision – respond with escalation, or downplay the attack.

Russia’s ability to launch long-range missile attacks has been seriously damaged, so it’ll be under pressure from ultranationalists to escalate, which means we should expect nuclear sabre rattling. A much worse scenario might involve a tactical nuclear “test” which leads us to the ultimate unanswerable question: how would President Trump respond?

Second, could this attack swing the war? Probably not, but history is full of underestimated military forces delivering unexpected blows that change the course of a war. The US dismissed North Vietnamese tactics until the Tet Offensive, and France thought its Maginot Line would hold until German Panzers simply drove around it. Similarly, if enemy attacks can now come from anywhere, at any time, it’s not too much to suggest this attack could trigger doctrinal rethinking within the Kremlin (and in every capital).

And finally, was this a glimpse into the future of war? AI-guided drones could change everything. Imagine: $500 consumer drones that can think for themselves, no human pilot needed, smuggled across borders, waiting months for the perfect moment to strike.

The decision to make details of this operation public ensures that Kremlin officials will be nervously wondering how many more Trojan wooden boxes there are across Russia.

Related Topics
Latest Author Articles
New York City’s election is global

Millions of New Yorkers head to the polls today (Tuesday) for Democratic primaries that’ll shape who ends up helming America’s biggest city and the world’s financial capital. The frontrunners include…  Given the city’s heavily Democratic vibes, today’s primary winner typically goes on to beat the Republican nominee to become New York’s next mayor. Stay on […]

24 June, 2025
The UK’s new top spy emerges from the shadows

Every now and then, the public gets a glimpse beyond the veil. Take this week, with news the UK’s new foreign intelligence agency (MI6) spymaster will be Blaise Metreweli. In his big reveal, PM Starmer endorsed her “excellent leadership” and noted she’s being promoted to ‘C’ (chief, though the ‘C’ derives from the surname of the original […]

17 June, 2025
What’s up with European bonds

Move aside US Treasuries, it’s European bonds getting all the attention right now.  You see, it turns out Japan offloaded $13B worth of German bonds back in April, even after Friedrich Merz looked set to restore Berlin’s political stability and fiscal sustainability. Who cares? Stay on top of your world from inside your inbox. Subscribe for free […]

12 June, 2025
China Spying on Russia? Parsing the NYT’s Scoop

The folks at The New York Times dropped an intriguing little nugget over the weekend, reporting they’d received an internal Russian intelligence memo warning that Beijing is a) spying on Russia’s war in Ukraine, b) spying on Russia’s presence in the Arctic, and c) covertly recruiting Russian academics, journalists, researchers, arms-makers, and beyond.  So first… where might this report have come from? The NYT notes it […]

10 June, 2025