The mystery of Cuba’s deadly shootout


A speedboat, heavily-armed men, Cuban sunsets, soaring stakes. This is not Denis Villeneuve pitching his next Bond, but actual events from Wednesday.

That’s when the communist-run island’s interior ministry issued a note detailing an intriguing incident involving a Florida-tagged speedboat. According to Cuba’s account…

  • the island’s coast guard spotted the speedboat a mile off Cuba’s shores
  • they approached the mysterious boat to request identification, and then…
  • the speedboat’s passengers opened fire, initiating a shootout that left four of the aggressors dead and the remaining six wounded (a Cuban officer got injured too).

Then a few hours later, Havana dropped a second note, adding further intrigue:

  • the Cubans say they arrested another guy who’d flown in to help the landing party
  • the speedboat had “assault rifles, handguns, improvised explosive devices (Molotov cocktails), body armor, telescopic sights, and camouflage uniforms”, and…
  • following interrogations, authorities determined the men “intended to carry out an infiltration for terrorist purposes”.

Then yesterday (Thursday), Havana started naming names. Turns out they’re all US-based Cuban nationals (at least two also had US citizenship), including…

  • Conrado Galindo Sariol (detained), a former political prisoner in Cuba who just told an exile outlet last year, “before I die, I would like to see her [Cuba] free
  • Héctor Duani Cruz Correa (dead), a tiler with two daughters in Cuba, who seems to have stolen the speedboat from his former boss in the Florida Keys
  • Amijail Sánchez González (detained), who’s done prior US jail stints (eg aggravated battery) and was already on Cuba’s terrorism watchlist over alleged arms smuggling to mount attacks against the Cuban military, and…
  • Michel Ortega Casanova (dead), whose Tampa associate told reporters the guy wanted to “go and fight against a criminal and murderous narco-tyrannical government, to see if that would spark the people to rise up”.

And… what’s the US saying about all this?

Not much, beyond denying any involvement, and ordering its own investigation.

So… what’s the real story here?

Here are three of the most intriguing theories doing the rounds:

  1. Was it a botched extraction?

The small sand islands near the shooting are a common departure point for locals desperate to escape to the US (90mi / 145km away), particularly as Cuba’s economic crisis worsens. So that’s a theory now doing the rounds in Florida: maybe Cuban exiles tried to extract their relatives (like Héctor’s two daughters), then panicked when caught.

And sure, it’s happened before — eg, five died when Cuba sprung a similar smuggling attempt in 2022. But on this occasion, some details aren’t a neat fit: the speedboat was already at or near capacity, and its passengers were seemingly armed like Arnie.

  1. Was it a lone wolf infiltration attempt?

At least three of those onboard (Galindo, Sánchez, and Ortega) were openly campaigning to oust Cuba’s regime: in fact, just two weeks ago, a frustrated Sánchez dropped a video pledging he — unlike US-based émigré elites — was “ready to die” to free Cuba.

So, all those details…? A yoinked boat, an angry video, plus family members stranded amid a worsening humanitarian situation? They all lend credence to some kind of lone wolf attempt to take matters into their own hands.

  1. Was it US-backed?

The US is now (again) openly yearning for regime change in Havana, and has a long history of pursuing that goal via Cuban exiles — they bring plausible deniability, endless motivation, local knowledge / networks, and more popular legitimacy.

Folks are also wondering why the US Coast Guard didn’t intercept the speedboat given the US president had just extended the relevant maritime interdiction authority.

So there are clearly (reported) details here that overlap with known US intent and tactics. But while JFK’s infamous Bay of Pigs debacle wasn’t exactly a picture of precision, it still reflected a degree of US coordination, training, and supply.

As for this speedboat incident? Parts just look so amateurish: the boat theft, the profiles, the video, and even the results (all dead / captured before even reaching shore). It’s just hard to square the US pulling sci-fi moves against Maduro, then opting for a tiler stealing his boss’s 1981 Pro-Line pleasure boat for a big move against Cuba.

Even Havana itself has stopped short of alleging direct US involvement, instead framing these events more as the US affording diaspora Cuban groups too much impunity.

Intrigue’s Take

The last time Cuba’s regime was under this much pressure (post Soviet-collapse), and open dissent was this risky, locals famously ordered their Cuba Libre (‘free Cuba’, aka a rum and cola) by stroking their chin then drawing their thumb across their neck: ie, implying Cuba would be free once Castro was dead.

It then took another quarter century for Castro to die in 2016, and his younger brother Raul is now 94 but still makes public appearances and remains highly influential — Raul’s chosen successor (Diaz-Canel) basically got his gig by pledging post-Castro Castroism.

So… our assessment? We’re operating off limited info, and there are (say) DC incentives to downplay any US role or diaspora militancy, plus regime incentives to frame this as terrorism. But that last “impunity” statement from Cuba’s deputy foreign minister above is telling:

  • Take decades of Cuban authoritarianism, a darkening humanitarian situation, no end in sight, and an active US-based diaspora big enough to include fringes openly stewing for revenge, freedom, and family, all while US authorities presumably have bigger fish to fry?

Against that backdrop, Occam’s razor suggests a blend of theories one (extraction) and/or two (infiltration) fits the most facts, accounts for the clearest motives, and requires the fewest assumptions. We say ‘blend’ because maybe some onboard planned to sneak ashore to foment an uprising, while others would return to the US with their families.

But to be clear, we don’t know, and maybe we’ll never know.

Related Topics
Latest Author Articles
Three big escalations for Iran

Welcome to day seven of the Third Gulf War which (per a line via Holly Dagres) is now more of a Gulf War than the first two Gulf Wars. Right now, the three big questions revolve around succession, secession, and suppression (always applaud outstanding alliteration). So let’s start with… Any list of folks denied their […]

6 March, 2026
Three things you need to watch in Iran

Again, with everything shifting so rapidly, here’s your quick recap since our last briefing: So with that quick update, here are the three things you need to track ahead:  If 2024 was the year of the Red Sea, and 2025 was the year of the Panama Canal, 2026 is shaping up as the year of […]

4 March, 2026
The US and Iran are back on the brink

The weekend is rolling around, which in recent times has meant one of two things: a) Sabrina Carpenter is about to unveil her latest brand collab, or b) the US is about to launch its latest daring military operation. As much as we’re keen to explore Sabrina’s Pringle-scented Redken hair mist and Dunkin’ x Prada […]

20 February, 2026
The massive supply chain shortage you didn’t know about

You’d think 2026 already had enough on, but no — someone has gone out and helpfully coined an entirely new genre of Armageddon: not nuclear, not biblical, but supply chain: So what’s driving this impending RAMageddon? Intrigue’s hard-core nerds will forgive us when we casually split chips into three families: Stay on top of your […]

18 February, 2026