Three reasons the Russo-Ukraine war might be a little more dynamic than you think


Ukraine is back on the front page (if it ever really left) after Russia launched its biggest-ever missile and drone strike on Monday, followed by a chaser attack yesterday (Tuesday).

It’s one of three intriguing developments happening in the war right now, with potential to shape the months and years ahead. So let’s take a look, shall we?

  1. Renewed Russian attacks on civilian infrastructure

Russian strikes have already destroyed half of Ukraine’s energy production capacity, with at least 80% of its thermal and 30% of its hydroelectric power now reportedly gone. Monday’s barrage even hit a dam at the Kyiv hydroelectric plant, which could cause catastrophic flooding if breached (it’s still okay for now).

That’s a grim scenario with winter around the corner.

So, why do it? Maybe it’s an odd question in the context of Putin’s whole invasion, but it’s still one worth asking because the answers are illuminating. So why? Putin is probably attacking Ukraine’s civilian infrastructure for a few reasons:

  • a) Because he can (Ukraine’s air defences are still porous)
  • b) To make life hard for everyday Ukrainians and erode morale, reduce support for Zelensky, push him to capitulate, and curb his leverage
  • c) As ‘revenge’ for (and a distraction from) Zelensky’s counterattacks in Kursk, which have been a humiliation, and
  • d) To undermine Ukraine’s ability to defend itself and produce arms.

Btw, the reasons for Ukraine’s counterattacks on Russia’s oil and gas infrastructure are clear: Putin finances (and fuels) his invasion with oil.

  1. Ukraine’s vaunted new long-range weapon 

President Zelensky has just claimed the deployment of a “completely new class of weapon”. It’s named the Palianytsia after a type of Ukrainian bread that’s famously tough for Russians to pronounce – the word was rumoured to be a test to unmask suspected spies in the war’s early days (like a modern-day Shibboleth).

Wartime leaders have incentives to exaggerate, and there’s little verifiable info in the public domain here, but Ukrainians are hinting the Palianytsia is a jet-powered drone with solid range (up to 700km) and low cost (sub-$1M per unit).

And there’d be several advantages to something like this:

  • Less reliance on Western arms (which are hostage to local politics)
  • Less reliance on Western agreement (hostage to ‘escalation’ fears), and
  • More Russian turf vulnerable to Ukrainian counterattacks (forcing Russia to pull back the bombers it uses to attack Ukraine’s cities).

But it’ll take time to scale-up production, so for now Zelensky is doubling down on his request to use Western weapons to strike back within Russia.

  1. A more dynamic battlefield?

Each side could plausibly claim it has the initiative right now:

  • Ukraine now holds 1,300 sq km (500mi), 100 settlements, and 600 POWs from across Russia’s Kursk region, with reports Ukrainian forces are now seeking to push into Russia’s neighbouring Belgorod region too, and
  • Russia seems days away from seizing a key logistical hub over in Ukraine’s east (Pokrovsk), after grinding forward there at staggering cost.

So 30 months into Putin’s invasion, this war is still evolving.

INTRIGUE’S TAKE

If your Black Sea fleet can no longer roam the Black Sea, can you still call it the Black Sea fleet? Somebody should ask Mr Putin, because apparently he quietly withdrew his last warship from occupied Crimea last month.

Ie, in two and a half years, we’ve gone from Putin confidently imposing an impenetrable blockade on a country with virtually no navy, to Putin quietly withdrawing his entire local fleet after losing a third of it to the Ukrainians.

Why do we talk about this stuff? As we flagged yesterday, we’re not expecting the conflict to end any time soon. But each move today can shape any eventual peace tomorrow. So with limited information and resources, both sides are now forcing the other to make some increasingly difficult decisions.

Also worth noting: 

  • UN nuclear watchdog chief Rafael Grossi has just visited Russia’s Kursk nuclear power plant (near the fighting), and has warned that the facility is “extremely exposed and fragile”.
  • Ukrainian President Volodomyr Zelenksy has announced he’ll travel to the US next month to present President Biden (plus Kamala Harris and Donald Trump) a “package to force Russia to end the war using diplomacy”.
Latest Author Articles
The US and Iran are back on the brink

The weekend is rolling around, which in recent times has meant one of two things: a) Sabrina Carpenter is about to unveil her latest brand collab, or b) the US is about to launch its latest daring military operation. As much as we’re keen to explore Sabrina’s Pringle-scented Redken hair mist and Dunkin’ x Prada […]

20 February, 2026
The massive supply chain shortage you didn’t know about

You’d think 2026 already had enough on, but no — someone has gone out and helpfully coined an entirely new genre of Armageddon: not nuclear, not biblical, but supply chain: So what’s driving this impending RAMageddon? Intrigue’s hard-core nerds will forgive us when we casually split chips into three families: Stay on top of your […]

18 February, 2026
The country on the verge of three different wars

Think you’re busy? Wait ‘til you meet Ethiopia’s Abiy Ahmed Ali (above), who’s now juggling three separate and interrelated conflicts, starting with…  This one’s got more backstory than Carrie and Mr Big, but basically Ethiopia’s 1962 annexation of its neighbour triggered Eritrea’s brutal 30-year war for independence, which eventually plunged Ethiopia back into its current […]

11 February, 2026
Trump sets his sights on Cuba

There’s a real Netflix energy to geopolitics coverage right now — Maduro gets yeeted, and within hours everyone is frothing over season two (Cuba). So… is Cuba next? Let’s find out. In the spirit of casually summarising seven decades of US-Cuba history in a paragraph already part-wasted on throat-clearing, the TLDR is there’s been bad […]

10 February, 2026