Blinken goes to Beijing


US Secretary of State Antony Blinken landed in Beijing yesterday (Sunday), marking the first visit to China by a top American diplomat since 2018.

That’s a long time between visits for two competing major powers. So it’s not surprising Blinken’s meeting with his counterpart Qin Gang ran for almost six hours (before they kicked on for a working dinner afterwards).

Each side had a long (and growing) list of grievances to get through. China remains irritated by America’s:

  • 💣 arms sales and other support for Taiwan
  • 🙅‍♀️ continued tariffs on $300B in Chinese goods
  • 👨‍💻 heavy restrictions on China’s access to advanced tech, and
  • 🚢 regular military and intelligence activities along China’s coast.

For its part, the US remains concerned by China’s:

  • 😨 continued intimidation of Taiwan
  • 🛩️ dangerous manoeuvres in international waters and airspace
  • 🤐 refusal to condemn Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, and
  • ✊ human rights abuses in Xinjiang, Hong Kong, Tibet and elsewhere.

Both China and the US released statements after yesterday’s marathon discussions. And by recent standards, both were pretty cordial.

Intrigue’s take: But the two sides are still so far apart, not just on the substance, but on how to approach the substance. The US wants “guardrails” to help manage the risk of US-China competition veering into conflict.

But China views “guardrails” as code for normalising the above US activities China doesn’t like. So for China’s part, the way to manage all this risk is for the US to back off, rather than pressure China into accepting “guardrails”.

None of this will get better without talking. But it may not get better with talking, either.

Also worth noting:

  • In breaking news, US officials have said Blinken will also meet China’s President Xi Jinping today (Monday) before departing China.
  • China’s foreign ministry spokesperson struck a hopeful tone about Blinken’s visit on Twitter.
Latest Author Articles
The top 3 quotes from Jackson Hole

The Super Bowl for economists (aka the Jackson Hole Economic Policy Symposium) just wrapped on Saturday, so let’s get you the top three quotes, starting with… There’s always been tension in the Fed’s dual mandate of chasing maximum employment versus stable prices. But the chair suggested this tension now looks different. Why? He argued President […]

25 August, 2025
The Alaska summit: winners, losers and those in between

So Alaska ended much as we foreshadowed: no deal. But ‘no deal’ doesn’t mean ’empty-handed’. Here’s a quick tally of the ‘wins’ each side is now claiming (agree or not). Putin’s arguable wins fall into three categories: perception, isolation, and negotiation: On the perception front, Kremlin propagandists argue that in a single afternoon, Putin shrugged […]

18 August, 2025
The Trump-Putin summit: the view from Europe

When news broke that Presidents Trump and Putin were ironing out the details on an Alaska summit (likely at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson), Europe’s initial response was wtf.  But there’s no feeling of strategic exclusion that jumping on a quick Zoom call can’t fix, so that’s what President Trump did with his counterparts from Ukraine and […]

14 August, 2025
The Alaska Summit: who wins?

Let’s get you a quick primer ahead of this Friday’s surprise Trump-Putin summit in Alaska. Why now? Trump made the announcement on Friday, the same day his peace-or-sanctions deadline on Putin was set to expire. It was a response to a proposal Putin relayed to Trump’s envoy (Witkoff) in Moscow on Wednesday. ✌️Proposal✌️ might be […]

11 August, 2025