Why Australia’s PM keeps getting left on read


Australia’s Anthony Albanese flew into Port Moresby this week expecting a big diplomatic win with his Papua New Guinea (PNG) neighbours: a long-anticipated Pukpuk mutual defence treaty promising joint security, shared training, cross-enlistment between militaries, plus a US$400M sweetener for things like sprucing up PNG’s parliament. 

In short, it’d upgrade Australia-PNG ties to a full-blown alliance (PNG’s first).

Instead, Albo (as he’s widely known) returned home with something much more mid: a statement promising the two neighbours will sign that treaty just as soon as they can. 

Maybe no big deal, right? They’ll cross those t’s and dot those lower-case-j’s, then sign.

Except… it’s the second delay of its kind in as many weeks, after Australia’s other US$330M pact with Vanuatu got put on ice.

So what’s going on here?

In military terms, an Australia-PNG alliance would be a bit like us becoming tennis doubles partners with Roger Federer — half the duo is a fair bit stronger.

So what’s in it for Australia?

Canberra talks about how rapidly Australia’s ✌️strategic outlook✌️ is ✌️deteriorating✌️, which is diplo-speak for crikey have you seen China’s military build-up. Beijing also rattled some in the region via its secretive security pact with Solomon Islands in 2022, and then again when it suddenly conducted live fire drills off Australia’s coast earlier this year.

But it’s not just hard power. China has also beefed up its regional influence via more infrastructure, trade, loans, and grants, all with fewer strings around, say, human rights.

So the Australians, caught out in 2022, have been hustling to counter China ever since, signing big pacts with Nauru and Tuvalu (and hoping Vanuatu and PNG might join) to avoid a Solomons repeat. They’ve used a mix of tactics, too, with levers across security, migration, and even sport.

So then… why the delays with Vanuatu and PNG?

Vanuatu has voiced concerns a big pact with Australia could jeopardise ties with China. And PNG is arguing it’s just a procedural thing, but there’s word it’s now quietly sending its defence minister to Beijing for a quick check-in before signing. Both Pacific nations have also flagged the importance of respecting their own sovereignty (PNG is celebrating its 50th anniversary of independence from Australia this week).

But the fear in Canberra is Beijing must have pressured these islands not to sign. Another consideration is the fact that, while Pacific Islands have voiced unease at being treated like pawns, they’re also now very adept at milking any competition for their own interests: Vanuatu’s deal, for example, is a massive upgrade on one it declined to ratify back in 2022.

Anyway, the likelihood this was all just a procedural hiccup will shrink with each passing week ahead.

Intrigue’s Take

Drawing parallels from history, let alone literature, can be fraught, but indulge us this one chance to reflect on the polarising Rudyard Kipling novel Kim from 1901. It’s set amid the ‘Great Game’, when the Brits and Russians were competing for influence in colonial India.

Here are four quotes that come to mind:

  • The Game is so large that one sees but a little at a time.” — this kind of geopolitical competition is opaque, long-term, and fluid, with each victory potentially only ever a mere morsel sitting within bigger jaws of defeat.
  • There is no sin so great as ignorance. Remember this” — Australia learned the hard way that decades of partnership (even if flawed) might not be enough to stop a determined rival from out-drawing you when the opportunity arises. You fill the gaps not just with intel, but investment.
  • I am Kim. I am Kim. And what is Kim?” — there’s an identity crisis at play for all involved, whether it’s Pacific Islands balancing their traditional Western ties against new opportunities out of China, or the West balancing its democratic values against the need for hard-nosed deals to counter authoritarian influence.
  • When everyone is dead the Great Game is finished. Not before.” — it’s a reminder how endless and all-consuming this kind of rivalry can become once it gets entrenched in every capital’s calculations. Like Kim’s Great Game in India, this escalating game in the Pacific will only end when one side gets exhausted. Not before.

Sound even smarter:

  • Australia and its Pacific neighbours are hoping to co-host next year’s COP climate talks — it’s an issue the Pacific Islands frequently cite as their top concern.
Latest Author Articles
Scratch regional: this war has gone global

Iran thought it was fighting the US and Israel. The US and Israel thought they were fighting Iran. But then others started getting added to the group chat without consent. Welcome to Thursday, Intriguers, because there are some new situations to monitor, starting with… You’ll have seen a US submarine sank the Iranian naval frigate […]

5 March, 2026
This is already a regional war

Things are moving fast, so let’s start with a quick “previously on The West Wing” recap. Since our last briefing, the US has achieved full air superiority over Tehran, broadened its target list (eg, a state TV broadcaster got hit), and its Israeli allies have broadcast a Netanyahu message in Farsi over Iran’s hacked TV […]

3 March, 2026
Germany’s China conundrum

President Xi could just leave his red carpet out on the tarmac at this point: France’s Macron was there in December, then in January he welcomed Canada’s Carney, Finland’s Orpo, and the UK’s Starmer, until Germany’s Friedrich Merz landed just this week. But don’t let all Europe’s social feed China-maxxing distract you from the bigger […]

26 February, 2026
Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, four years on

As Ukrainians today mark their fourth year of defending against a Russian invasion — 11 years if you start the timer from Russia’s seizure of Crimea — peace looks no closer. Why? Putin continues to claim marginal gains at staggering cost: he’s now averaging ~44,000 casualties a month (and rising) in return for 50-100 sq […]

24 February, 2026