Xi shakes up China’s military (again)


In amongst the weekend’s historic vote in Congress, a surprise album-drop by Taylor Swift, and another new episode of Bluey, you could be forgiven for not following the movements of China’s leader, Xi Jinping. In fact, we do forgive you.

But on Friday night in Beijing, Xi arrived at a nondescript office and casually announced yet another military shake-up – the largest in almost a decade. What’s going on?

Shortly after Xi took power in 2012, he started emphasising his vision to restore China’s greatness (“the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation“). And it was soon apparent that a key part of Xi’s plan involved reforming China’s military.

He went on to set two clear goals for the People’s Liberation Army (PLA):

  1. A military that “obeys the party’s commands: while technically loyal to the Communist Party (rather than China’s constitution or state), the powerful PLA has itself long been a key political and economic player. So it’s been central to Xi’s efforts to consolidate his grip on power.
  2. A military that “can fight and win: the PLA hasn’t really been tested since its brief but bloody invasion of Vietnam in 1979, which was a disaster. So Xi wants a high-tech, modern, and more integrated force befitting a China he’s now restoring to greatness.

With those objectives in mind, Xi pushed through his first big PLA reforms in 2015, creating the ‘Strategic Support Forces’ (SSF) as a fifth military branch, alongside the PLA’s ground forces, navy, air force, and rocket force.

The idea was twofold: adding a fifth branch reporting to Xi directly (via his Central Military Commission, or CMC) would help dilute the power of the PLA’s other established branches; and, it’d help the PLA lift its game for modern warfare across domains like intelligence, space, and cyber.

And that’s where Friday’s announcement comes in: Xi just abolished the SSF, only eight years after he created it. In its place, the SSF’s component parts are now four lower-level ‘arms’ of the PLA, each still reporting directly to Xi :

  • The Information Support Force is tasked with providingintelligence and psychological warfare support
  • The Aerospace Force will support China’s military objectives from space (though it denies militarising space)
  • The Cyberspace Force focuses on fighting cyber wars, and
  • The Joint Logistics Support Force echoes that classic Schwarzkopf quote (“amateurs talk tactics, professionals talk logistics”) while also diluting the army’s power by yoinking its long-held logistics function.

But why does all this matter?

As bureaucratic as it sounds (like Barry from HR re-drawing the office org-chart for the 50th time) – and as intriguing as it is to see China seemingly acknowledge its cyber and space forces for the first time – the value here is really the window this announcement offers into what’s still such an opaque system.

INTRIGUE’S TAKE

So, once we look through Friday’s small and frosted window, what do we see?

Xi himself might see some positives: he’ll hope this shake-up reminds his generals who’s boss: he was reportedly caught unawares by last year’s spy balloon saga, with echoes of his predecessor’s PLA humiliation in 2011.

Xi will also hope Friday’s shake-up signals his ability to course correct: each of the PLA’s new ‘arms’ focuses on an area where Russia has demonstrated notable defects in Ukraine: information, space, cyber, and logistics.

But from the outside, there are also some negatives on display. First, it shows Xi is still prioritising control over competence (eg, there’s nothing to suggest his inner circle is equipped to, say, shape cyber or psychological warfare).

Second, he’s still prioritising loyalty over leadership: he told Friday’s generals to “resolutely obey” the Party, and they duly said they’ll “diligently listen” to orders. But the thing about a modern military is its officers show leadership and initiative at the unit level, generating options while obeying orders.

And third, Xi’s idea was probably to flatten and optimise the PLA’s structure, but he’s arguably just shifted the bottleneck from the PLA to within Xi’s own inner circle: if a conflict breaks out, eight separate corners of the PLA will now be reporting directly for orders. And that sounds like a recipe for paralysis.

Also worth noting:

  • The head of China’s former Strategic Support Forces (Ju Qiansheng) went missing last year amid reports of corruption. He’s now re-emerged, though it’s unclear where he’s been, or what he does now.
  • The US announced the formation of its own space force in 2018.
  • According to a study released just hours ago, China’s annual defence spending is $296B or 1.6% of GDP, growing at 6% per year. Annual US defence spending is around $916B or 3.3% of GDP, growing at 2.3% each year. Russia is at $109B or 5.9% of GDP, growing at 24% last year.

Latest Author Articles
The top 3 quotes from Jackson Hole

The Super Bowl for economists (aka the Jackson Hole Economic Policy Symposium) just wrapped on Saturday, so let’s get you the top three quotes, starting with… There’s always been tension in the Fed’s dual mandate of chasing maximum employment versus stable prices. But the chair suggested this tension now looks different. Why? He argued President […]

25 August, 2025
The Alaska summit: winners, losers and those in between

So Alaska ended much as we foreshadowed: no deal. But ‘no deal’ doesn’t mean ’empty-handed’. Here’s a quick tally of the ‘wins’ each side is now claiming (agree or not). Putin’s arguable wins fall into three categories: perception, isolation, and negotiation: On the perception front, Kremlin propagandists argue that in a single afternoon, Putin shrugged […]

18 August, 2025
The Trump-Putin summit: the view from Europe

When news broke that Presidents Trump and Putin were ironing out the details on an Alaska summit (likely at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson), Europe’s initial response was wtf.  But there’s no feeling of strategic exclusion that jumping on a quick Zoom call can’t fix, so that’s what President Trump did with his counterparts from Ukraine and […]

14 August, 2025
The Alaska Summit: who wins?

Let’s get you a quick primer ahead of this Friday’s surprise Trump-Putin summit in Alaska. Why now? Trump made the announcement on Friday, the same day his peace-or-sanctions deadline on Putin was set to expire. It was a response to a proposal Putin relayed to Trump’s envoy (Witkoff) in Moscow on Wednesday. ✌️Proposal✌️ might be […]

11 August, 2025