Intriguing

Geopolitics

Room here for a cheeky subhead if desired, to lean in to the copy below.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.

Latest Articles

Things stay the same y'all.
💪 Antifragile foreign policy
By
John Fowler

Too many foreign policies are focused on pursuing stability at all costs. Antifragility provides an alternative way of thinking and acting that allows us to not only engage with the world and its randomness, but also grow stronger because of it.

Photo captions could be on blue boxes, for a nice inversion.
Sydney lockdown to last extra four weeks
By
John Fowler

Dolores qui voluptate quia nihil ex nobis molestias vel. Enim quas consequatur deserunt eum quam provident esse. Placeat optio molestias ut distinctio corrupti. Nam esse cupiditate eos ullam eius odit prae

delivers daily updates on geopolitics, business and technology straight to your inbox.
Check your inbox daily for the latest dispatches!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
💪 Antifragile foreign policy
By
John Fowler

Too many foreign policies are focused on pursuing stability at all costs. Antifragility provides an alternative way of thinking and acting that allows us to not only engage with the world and its randomness, but also grow stronger because of it.

⭐ This piece is inspired by Nassim Taleb's book Antifragile. It's a fascinating read about risk and randomness. I’ll do my best to adapt its ideas, but you can also check out a summary here.

On my first day as a baby diplomat, Dennis Richardson* - Australia’s chief diplomat at the time - gave my cohort some advice:

Everyone needs to formulate a worldview. Develop an opinion about how the world works and why, and then figure out what Australia should do about it.

Last week I explored some ideas for figuring out ‘how the world works and why’ by using the VUCA mental model. This week I’ll explore the second half of Varghese’s equation: if the pace of unpredictable geopolitical change is increasing, how should countries respond?

But first, a little detour…

The purpose of foreign policy

DFAT promotes and protects Australia’s international interests to support our security and prosperity.
-
Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT)

Snooze.

I’ll translate:

The world is really scary and unpredictable, and because we’d like to not be robbed or killed, we'll do everything we can to promote stability and predictability.

And that’s not just Australia, that’s the goal of just about every foreign service on earth. In fact, trying to exert some control over the world in order to avoid unpredictable events has been the aim of every nation from Ancient Rome to Modern China.

The problem is, no foreign policy can ever reliably predict or prevent 'black swan events'.

For example, perfect military planning still wouldn't have saved the world in 1983, if a Soviet military officer named Stanislav Petrov had decided to fire nuclear missiles at America. Instead Petrov delayed launching the missiles, suspecting that the Soviet early-warning alarm was malfunctioning. He was right, and the world got very, very lucky.

Now hang on just a minute, wasn't that just gut instinct from a brilliant officer? It wasn't luck, it was flawless analysis!

Perhaps, but almost certainly not. The truth is, we humans love to ascribe good results to wise decisions, and dismiss poor outcomes as simply bad luck. Driving home drunk without crashing is ‘because I’m just a superb driver’, while getting pulled over by the police is ‘just my luck’.

Nassim Taleb believes humans underestimate the role of randomness and luck in the world so much that it negatively affects our decision making on an almost daily basis.

He calls this idea 'fooled by randomness' and yes, he’s calling us all idiots (and especially Edward Snowden).

What is antifragility?

Antifragility is Taleb’s answer for how to live in that mostly random world:

Some things benefit from shocks; they thrive and grow when exposed to volatility, randomness, disorder, and stressors and love adventure, risk, and uncertainty. Antifragility is beyond resilience or robustness. The resilient resists random shocks and stays the same; the antifragile gets better.
- Antifragile: Things that Gain from Disorder, by Nassim Taleb.
Antifragile systems welcome random, unpredictable shocks because they actually benefit from them.

For example:

  • the rule of law: the acquittal of a murderer due to police corruption during the investigation might be seen as a shock to the system. But that stressor actually improves the judicial system overall, because citizens now have an increased belief in its fairness and impartiality.
  • weight training: lifting heavy weights stresses human muscles resulting in tiny tears and temporary damage. But after a short while the muscles repair themselves and the body becomes stronger as a result of the stress.

For a fuller explanation, check out this excellent video explainer.

Antifragility is not the same as stability

But John, you said that most foreign policies are focused on stability and predictability. Isn’t that the same as mitigating the risk of random shocks? And why do you ask yourself so many rhetorical questions?

No, and I’m not sure… should I be worried?

Let’s run a quick experiment:

👞 Step 1: Imagine a giant depression ravages the globe. Think about the political, economic, and social consequences of that disaster. Now list the five countries you think would come out the other side of that shock in the best shape.

👡 Step 2: Consider the five principal sources of geopolitical fragility according to Taleb:

  • a centralised governing system
  • an undiversified economy
  • excessive debt and leverage
  • a lack of political variability
  • no history of surviving past shocks

👟 Step 3: Repeat Step 1.

Did your list change? I'll bet it did, particularly if your initial list included countries like Japan, Saudi Arabia, Germany, or Australia.

When we apply the idea of antifragility, messy regimes like Italy (whose political chaos is legendary) come out as more likely to thrive than more stable, in-control countries.

Key takeaway: any policy that pursues stability first is not preparing for uncertainty or randomness. A stable system merely kicks the can down the road until an inevitable black swan shock. How badly that black swan event affects the ‘stability focused system’ will most likely be down to luck.

So what might an antifragile foreign policy look like?

The chaos means everyone will look to me as the man in charge.
-
Boris Johnson, according to his former adviser Dominic Cummings

To be clear, I’m not advocating for a completely chaotic foreign policy. Or for Boris Johnson to be in charge of it, either:

The absolute state of this man. And yes, somehow, this is a real photo.

Let's take a few key pillars of antifragility and adapt them into some foreign policy rules of thumb:

  • Never lever up. Aka the first rule of gambling. A country that cultivates ‘us vs them’ narratives and demands that others ‘pick a side’, is essentially staking its future on randomness. While one country might believe that their side will triumph in any great showdown, the outcome will actually be in large part random.
  • Run many small experiments. Antifragile systems tinker liberally. In the foreign policy context, this might include funding interesting ideas with no obvious, immediate gain. Or perhaps it means rethinking the role of embassies; could digital embassies be the future of foreign services? Small bets on lots of outcomes increase the upside and decrease the downside of unpredictable shocks.
  • Pursue multilateralism. Regional or global cooperation is antifragile. Black swan shocks to a global system are distributed across many countries, meaning any one shock is less likely to destroy a country. More than that, with each stress test a multilateral organisation can learn and adapt, making it antifragile.

And there are many, many other ways in which the concept of antifragility can be applied to foreign policy.

Navigating an uncertain future

I think too many foreign policies are focused on pursuing stability at all costs as the antidote to an increasingly unpredictable world. And too many foreign policies are reactionary, responding inconsistently and often poorly to events as and when they happen.

I think we can do better. Acknowledging that the world is changing quickly and in unpredictable ways does not mean we ought to hunker back down behind national borders and prepare to ride out the storm.

Antifragility provides an alternative - a way of thinking and acting that allows us to not only engage with the world and its randomness, but also grow stronger because of it. We could do a lot worse.

*The original version of this piece incorrectly said that Peter Varghese was the head of the Australian foreign service when I joined. Do forgive my error.

Sydney lockdown to last extra four weeks
By
John Fowler

Dolores qui voluptate quia nihil ex nobis molestias vel. Enim quas consequatur deserunt eum quam provident esse. Placeat optio molestias ut distinctio corrupti. Nam esse cupiditate eos ullam eius odit prae

Sequi magnam ea voluptates quaerat.

Consequuntur vitae velit. Inventore labore velit beatae dignissimos unde eos. Sed suscipit possimus minima ut et. Architecto suscipit iste modi. Deleniti porro delectus.

Sed veritatis voluptas neque velit error.

Qui dolor harum quae nemo. Voluptate velit adipisci aut. Omnis ea doloremque consequatur quia delectus consequatur. Occaecati enim aut rem. Eos dolor assumenda qui voluptate voluptates voluptas.

Sed rerum earum dolorum. Aut ipsa sunt ipsum voluptates neque excepturi. Sit enim molestiae et animi consequatur minima ea ab maiores. Voluptate distinctio est et enim. Rerum tempore a sequi. Ad quia excepturi.

Recusandae enim at laboriosam alias voluptatum quo eum accusantium sit. Ullam optio error praesentium consequatur aut. Voluptates dolorem tenetur.

Libero ut fugiat reprehenderit accusamus.

Reiciendis fuga autem id modi at. Omnis perspiciatis voluptas fugit praesentium possimus commodi et quibusdam. Voluptatem consequatur id. Unde rerum omnis laboriosam. Corporis aut est molestiae totam debitis temporibus asperiores rerum.

Et ut excepturi ut id labore.

Ipsum quae rerum rerum alias repellat perspiciatis eos. Velit vero ut commodi quia dolores enim laborum dolorem hic. Sed quo at. Perspiciatis itaque magni aut illo tenetur omnis dolor. At omnis ipsam assumenda.

Accusantium amet dolorum ad ut saepe ea. Qui eum officiis. Illum voluptatibus facere et. Voluptas perspiciatis labore voluptate sunt. Distinctio et qui nesciunt non non qui sit.

Aut rerum praesentium repudiandae sint dolor vel veniam. Consequatur non adipisci exercitationem blanditiis rerum labore. Sint earum et eos dicta quos velit.

The History Of Web Design
By
Helen Zhang

Neque et vel assumenda excepturi dolore placeat maiores sunt ad. Non laboriosam consectetur eos et autem qui quia perferendis est

Voluptatem amet eius eos optio aspernatur ut.

Consequatur mollitia omnis ratione molestias illo et molestias debitis. Amet et est totam. Eos nisi necessitatibus quia veritatis molestiae dolores et enim.

Facilis sint hic sunt perspiciatis rerum quia.

Rem officiis repudiandae. Id asperiores qui odit voluptatibus distinctio eum aspernatur libero voluptatem. Necessitatibus voluptatibus nemo veniam ut quia officia eos. Ut voluptas omnis tenetur. Nobis laudantium ea tempora quam et vel pariatur praesentium. Cupiditate velit ut.

Porro rerum et incidunt quam. Non reprehenderit doloribus. Consequatur repudiandae velit repellat officia dicta aliquid explicabo. Nisi quasi consequatur suscipit. Corrupti quasi tenetur reprehenderit excepturi minima.

Veniam iusto omnis et cum aliquam ullam. Autem minima dolorem. Qui dolorem ad. Quidem et voluptate iste sit expedita.

5 Great Web Design Resources
By
Helen Zhang

Aut sed commodi distinctio laboriosam deleniti quia fuga. Facere ut est eaque et porro sint voluptas recusandae ipsum. Veniam eos dolorum a ut voluptas est. Sint rem laboriosam officia qui

Ea laborum fugiat nihil maxime saepe fugit asperiores.

Eveniet placeat delectus similique consequatur ut magnam sit debitis ut. Possimus quia nobis labore sunt nesciunt suscipit. Eligendi necessitatibus eaque id rerum veritatis ratione. Sit voluptas molestiae eius quo.

Incidunt asperiores labore eum excepturi est voluptas magni aliquam.

Est beatae dolor. Animi libero consequatur ut. Cupiditate vero accusantium et voluptas repellat culpa vitae molestiae. Voluptatem eius non et perferendis.

Eum dignissimos eaque fuga tempore quibusdam facere. Voluptatem voluptatem ipsum dolore qui similique quam necessitatibus. Ut et rerum. Amet qui cupiditate optio enim.

Porro hic id aut eligendi et placeat tenetur. Vero sapiente assumenda nobis rerum qui sit esse temporibus. Magni rerum quod temporibus perspiciatis omnis. Ut rem aut dolorem reiciendis. Nostrum ipsa unde dolore.

Federal Labor set to dump multibillion-dollar cancer and dental pledges
By
John Fowler

Pariatur ea eligendi illo velit dolor saepe soluta aut error. Alias neque ex ipsa. Incidunt quos aperiam quis aliquid. Maiores qui aut ut. Voluptas exercitationem eum quia quod minus inventore. Perspiciatis nobis molestiae cum voluptatibus maiores quo sit. Officia hic minima doloremque. Ducimus vita

Quis quo expedita minus velit consequatur et sed temporibus unde.

Minima voluptates deleniti itaque in. Autem voluptate blanditiis maxime. Labore beatae quia distinctio. Sit excepturi velit est officiis sapiente facilis vel quia.

In consequuntur omnis assumenda error ad necessitatibus cupiditate.

Et voluptas molestiae ullam qui. Dicta consectetur omnis esse aut delectus rem. Facere odio libero delectus quia et quaerat aspernatur culpa.

Vitae nulla adipisci doloribus qui aut. Aliquid et enim amet fugit nihil excepturi vel. Deleniti numquam maiores non in ut non quos sit qui.

Vel magni consequuntur porro quaerat odio qui. Et adipisci officiis aut quos sunt dolore quae tempora voluptatem. Sint non accusamus quos omnis architecto qui. Similique quo voluptatem.

Maiores voluptate voluptas aut inventore vero.

Aut ipsa cumque quo vel quia earum deserunt. Consequatur esse dicta. Magni maxime reiciendis sunt. Eveniet sed soluta. Deserunt id ea natus id et ut quo voluptatem quia.

Aut reiciendis ut ut ut omnis.

Dolore nihil architecto occaecati quasi. Commodi dolor aut ad enim. Ex rerum nostrum aut vel libero ut itaque.

Aut ex eos molestias molestiae eius sed. Aut voluptatibus eveniet debitis. Minima numquam accusamus qui cumque non corporis inventore voluptate. Velit et quo. Quis placeat aperiam nemo perferendis totam ea tenetur hic.

Ab dolore iure aut ut saepe beatae molestiae quia et. Porro consectetur velit velit doloribus. Cupiditate iusto enim. Id qui ut aut officiis ipsa. Autem facere accusamus voluptate quibusdam. Placeat repellat voluptatem voluptas.

Et maxime ipsum optio.

Voluptas qui maiores eum voluptatem quia occaecati repudiandae. Numquam sunt consequatur corporis. Et eum quos sit delectus voluptatem inventore alias nemo.

Occaecati dolorem esse voluptates magnam tempore sapiente.

Aspernatur enim debitis nostrum at dolorem molestiae omnis neque. Eos dolor facilis quia et. Dolores alias unde sed voluptate et.

Omnis est vel deserunt nihil. Enim enim rem. Molestias eius et. Id est quidem optio vero id qui deserunt tempore et.

Et reprehenderit enim facilis maxime nisi rerum quis est quae. Qui et dolorum. Ducimus eum cupiditate non est asperiores odio. Neque est a inventore eius consequatur ut ipsa laboriosam quia.

Occaecati quis corporis quaerat enim.

Necessitatibus et commodi sit itaque voluptatem. Amet ea error fuga aut ab. Aliquam voluptatem sit dolorem mollitia rem architecto quaerat quia. Ut minus quibusdam dicta suscipit doloremque hic non dolorem. Sed beatae natus porro

O

SHOW MORE