Plus: Did I mention I'm a diplomat?
Today’s briefing: |
Sponsored by: |
Good morning Intriguer. Intrigue co-founder Helen and I have just wrapped some big speaking engagements Down Under and, as this hits your inbox, we’re now hosting Intrigue drinks in Sydney!
In fact, at this very moment, I’m either laughing loudly at one of Helen’s high-quality jokes, or using one of those t-shirt cannons to launch some Intrigue merch into a cheering crowd. I haven’t decided yet.
But while I workshop the details, allow me to sprinkle some freshly grated optimism over your inbox before we get to today’s briefing on (ahem) our world’s new arms race.
It was a point that emerged during our panel today: some of modern history’s biggest diplomatic breakthroughs (like the treaties on outer space and arms control) actually emerged out of some of modern history’s most tense moments (the Cold War).

PS – Our sincere thanks to Blackbird’s Sunrise conference for hosting us this week.
0.3%
That’s how much the US economy shrank at an annual pace in Q1, reflecting the biggest non-Covid surge in US imports since 1972, as firms tried to get ahead of Trump’s tariffs.
Locked and loaded

The Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) was born back in the 1960s, after Sweden’s then prime minister (who we imagine rocked a turtleneck) suggested establishing a new thinktank to commemorate the country’s 150 years of unbroken peace.
And SIPRI has been absolutely pumping out reports ever since, but it’s really grabbed international attention in recent years, charting how a spooked world is now re-arming.
In fact, the latest SIPRI report suggests this trend might even be accelerating.
Here are six of the report’s most intriguing numbers:
-
37%
That’s how much we’ve ramped up global military spending over the past decade, now hitting a cool $2,718B. And a majority of that has occurred in the past four years, with 2024 recording the single biggest jump (~10%) since at least the end of the Cold War.
To be clear — this spending isn’t tracking economic growth. Rather, everyone’s dedicating more of their national pie to re-arming, which gets us to who’s doing all the spending…
-
60%
That’s how much of the world’s military spending now comes from just five countries: the US, China, Russia, Germany, and India (in that order). Drill down a little more?
The US alone accounts for 37%, ahead of China (~12%) and Russia (~5.5%).
But those numbers aren’t static…
-
30
That’s how many consecutive years China’s military spending has now been growing, the longest recorded streak for any country. Why? President Xi formalised two goals back at his Communist Party’s 19th National Congress in 2017 — he wanted:
-
a fully modernised and intelligent military by 2035, and
-
one capable of winning wars by 2050.
But he then quickly accelerated that 2035 modernisation target to 2027, aligning with the People’s Liberation Army’s 100th anniversary. And does 2027 ring a bell? It’s also the year when, according to folks like the former heads of INDOPACOM and CIA, Xi wants his military capable of taking Taiwan (btw, both clarified that capability doesn’t mean intent).
And speaking of shifting the goalposts…
-
18
That’s how many of NATO’s 32 members have now reached the alliance’s 2% spending pledge in 2024. Sure, that’s up from 11 a year earlier, but NATO capitals are now grappling with President Trump’s new 5% target: the early-adopters include Poland, Lithuania, and Estonia, all bordering (and formerly occupied by) Russia.
Fun fact (heavily contingent on your definition of fun): can you guess which single European country hasn’t increased its military spending over the last year? Tiny Malta.
And can you guess which country ramped up its spending the most, globally?
-
$202 million
The answer is Guyana! Its $202M defence budget above is a rounding error for any major player, but still up a massive 78% from the year before. And to remember why, just look at who’s next door: Venezuela’s dictator Nicolas Maduro continues to claim two thirds of Guyana-controlled turf.
And… even we were a little surprised to see which country dropped its spending by…
-
20%
Saudi Arabia! That 20% drop is over the past decade rather than the past year, but it’s still big, particularly for a top spender like the Saudis. Why?
They’ve wound down their military intervention against the Iran-backed Houthis in neighbouring Yemen, and their oil-infused budget surpluses have dried up, but the kingdom is still the region’s biggest military spender and the world’s seventh largest.
Intrigue’s Take
One way to look at all this is like a balancing act of balancing acts: while there’s a shared sense of insecurity driving defence spending up just about everywhere, that’s coming at a time when most governments are already struggling to balance their books.
So there’s this balance between boosting security without either a) undermining your own debt sustainability, or b) undermining other national strengths and even your own approval ratings when you have to finance this stuff via spending cuts elsewhere.
There’s also this balance between governments wanting immediate results through importing arms off the shelf, versus trying to boost your own longer-term capabilities at home, which can take many, many years.
And then there’s the overall pace at which you move on all of the above: walk too slow, and it might not be enough to reverse years of underinvestment; run too fast, and you might spook the neighbours into making a big miscalculation.
Today’s newsletter is sponsored by Foreign Affairs
Read By Decision-Makers. Curated for Changemakers.
Foreign Affairs delivers insightful, authoritative analysis from global leaders in policy, business, science, and technology. From Washington to Beijing, it's the trusted source for analysis that drives real-world decisions.
Subscribe to Foreign Affairs today to get an insider look on today’s most important debates. With six issues per year, daily web articles, more than a century of archives, and an app to customize your experience, there has never been a better way to stay informed.
Meanwhile, elsewhere…

![]() |
🇺🇦 UKRAINE – US and Ukraine sign minerals deal. Comment: While the deal reportedly provides Kyiv with no additional security guarantees, it might remove a source of tension between the two leaders, and could give President Trump political cover to continue some US support for Ukraine. |
![]() |
🇺🇸 UNITED STATES – Is Tesla looking for a new CEO? Comment: This is a real dilemma for the board — Musk’s political and geopolitical role has now triggered consumer blowback, but his departure would risk market blowback given his role in Tesla’s success since 2008. Fun fact: Tesla Chair Robyn Denholm spoke on a panel at the same conference as Intrigue earlier today (of course, no comment). |
![]() |
🇯🇵 JAPAN – Tokyo slashes growth forecast. |
![]() |
🇪🇺 BRUSSELS – Beijing lifts EU sanctions. Comment: As the White House’s evolving approach to the world upends chess pieces, capitals everywhere are revisiting their take on friend and foe alike. Beijing will sense an opportunity to further split the West, and these political gestures to mend EU ties are presumably to help serve that end. |
![]() |
🇻🇳 VIETNAM – China, Laos, and Cambodia join Vietnam parade. Comment: Guess who wasn’t clapping from the VIP section? DC reportedly instructed the US ambassador not to attend, though a lower-ranked US diplomat later turned up at a related reception. That mixed US attendance reflects America’s tricky balancing act between not wanting to a) applaud a strategic rival like China, b) alienate a strategic partner like Vietnam, and c) not wanting to diss the many US veterans who’ve been personally championing US-Vietnam reconciliation over the years. You’d be stunned how much analysis goes into a single RSVP. |
![]() |
🇨🇴 COLOMBIA – Security forces targeted by armed groups. Comment: There’s been talk of capitals trying to replicate El Salvador’s success in crushing organised crime, but you’ve got to remember Colombia is 50 times bigger, with eight times the population, and confronting a more sophisticated and complicated series of foes all variously blending crime, ideology, and long-standing local grievances. |
![]() |
🇩🇿 ALGERIA – Draft law could hand military further powers. Comment: This is probably intended as both a regional flex (don’t mess with us) and a domestic tool (harnessing a bit of nationalism) to deflect from its economic woes and political dissent. |
Extra Intrigue
In other worlds…
-
Climate adaptation: Schools in the Philippines are now altering their class timetables and installing water fountains in classrooms to avoid having to shut down for entire days amid record temperatures.
-
Art: A museum in the Netherlands is researching how to restore a $57M Mark Rothko painting after a young child “made scratches” on the artwork’s surface.
-
Defense: The European Defence Agency has chosen André Denk, a German general (rather than the traditional diplomat or politician), to lead the department, which drives defence cooperation among EU member states.
Meme of the day

Who doesn’t love getting an ooooh or maybe even one of those sweet sweet aaaaahs when telling others what you do for a crust, right? Family Guy even wrote a great joke about it, with an insecure Peter hoping to impress his old school friends by turning up to a reunion as a ‘cowboy astronaut millionaire’ (then embodied by Jeff Bezos).
And while of course it’s always an honour to serve your country and your community, it does come with plenty of pain to balance out the perks: it’s high stress, low pay, tough on families, and tough on livers.
So this is a shout-out to the many diplomats reading us each day, all around the world. If today’s briefing on military spending is a reminder of anything, it’s that your work, often unseen, matters now as much as ever.
Today’s poll
Do you think we're in the midst of an arms race? |
Yesterday’s poll: Do you think the US's global standing is stronger than it was 101 days ago?
🟨⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️ 👍 Yes, you've got to break a few eggs to make an omelette (16%)
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 👎 No, it’s undermined it (83%)
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️ ✍️ Other (write in!) (1%)
Your two cents:
-
👎 E.K.H: “Every country should be looking at ways to cut trade ties with the US… Even the ones lining up to negotiate trade deals should only expect to minimize short-term impact while they diversify away long-term.”
-
👍 M.P: “The knee jerk response is No, but who was sucking up to us before?”
-
👎 D.H: “Transactional diplomacy means no friends and no friends is a lonely place.”
-
✍️ M.T: “I think the US is ahead of the game in terms of a necessary review and rebalancing, which was going to be messy no matter who did it.”