🌍 The India-Pakistan spat: four scenarios

133 

That’s how many cardinals are now locked in the Sistine Chapel to elect a new pope. It should’ve been 135 (the total number of cardinals aged under 80), but two called in sick. Yesterday’s first vote ended with black smoke (no pope).

Where next for India and Pakistan?

After two weeks of warnings, India unveiled its Operation Sindoor yesterday, featuring nine “precision strikes” across Kashmir’s line of control (LoC) into Pakistan-administered turf. It was the long-expected response to last month’s terrorist attack targeting Hindu tourists in Indian-controlled Kashmir, leaving 28 dead from India, Nepal, and the UAE.

• A Pakistan-based jihadi group claimed responsibility but then, mysteriously, retracted the claim, alleging it was all a hack by Indian intelligence, while…

• India has long argued Pakistani intelligence backs these groups, so the retraction could’ve been due to Islamabad’s pressure, or even local Kashmiri outrage.

Anyway, neither side is blinking, with Pakistan vowing its own retaliation to the retaliation.

That’s what you call a classic escalation ladder, with domestic political pressure pushing both governments higher and higher. So, what happens next? Here are four scenarios —

1. Flexing over?

Delhi says it never entered Pakistan’s airspace, and limited its strikes to terrorist infrastructure. For its part, Islamabad has condemned the strikes as an act of war and has claimed hits back against Indian jets (at least three of which we know have “crashed”).

So maybe that’s enough for both sides to take a win and step away — Pakistan has even pledged not to take “irresponsible action” if India taps the brakes. Then the uneasy status quo ante could resume: diplomatic frost, border incidents, edgy statements, and so on.

But there’s still unquenched outrage on both sides of the border fuelled by history, politics, competition, and faith (last month’s attackers checked ID cards to target Hindus).

2. Tit-for-tat

If Pakistan’s hawks get their way, they might feel the need for a ‘quid pro quo plus’ — a punitive retaliation to re-establish deterrence abroad and legitimacy at home.

In this version, the tit-for-tat continues until each side feels it can declare victory. This stops short of full war, though is still enough to rattle markets, divert flights, take lives, and invite a growing chorus of calls from foreign capitals to just cool it.

But in the meantime, the risk of miscalculation lingers: that fighter jet turns out to be a passenger jet; that terrorist base turns out to be a holy site; that test fire gets mistaken for the real thing. All real-world examples, and all posing real-world risks of something bigger.

3. New playing field

These two foes might also reach for non-military ways to inflict pain, like India’s move to suspend the 1960 Indus Waters Treaty (providing 90% the water for Pakistan’s crops).

India doesn’t yet have the infrastructure to divert these rivers — and that’s assuming it’d want the optics of starving 240 million neighbours — so it’s a rhetorical flex for now.

But it hints at the many non-military (but still escalatory) ways these nuclear powers might try to raise costs on the other. And ultimately, that escalation ladder leads to…

4. The nukes come out

But we leave this one last, and with reason. Aside from the obvious that it’s the worst case scenario, it’s also the least likely.

Still, India and Pakistan have been here before and in each instance, word has eventually leaked that planners considered nuclear scenarios. Yet also in each instance, a varying mix of US mediation, local restraint, and targeted concessions has helped de-escalate things.

But this isn’t 1999 or even 2019 — the US is spread thin, and so is India-Pakistan patience.

Intrigue’s Take

The other dynamic here is how global players calculate their next move — each flare-up in today’s multipolar world becomes an opportunity to out-manoeuvre your rival. China backs Pakistan, Russia has traditionally armed India, and the US is trying to muscle in to nudge Indian power towards curbing Beijing, which in turn sees closer Moscow ties as a way to help keep Delhi in check. This is a tough neighbourhood.

As for what the Kashmiris themselves want? The last time we saw anything close to credible polling (2009-10), a plurality of folks (~44%) actually just wanted independence.

Sound even smarter:

• As this hits your inbox, there are reports India just conducted additional strikes targeting Pakistani air defence radars. Looks like the tit-for-tat continues.

Today’s newsletter is sponsored by Growthschool

Learn Million Dollar AI Strategies & Tools in this 3 hour AI Workshop. Growthschool is bringing this special offer for a ChatGTP & AI Workshop to our readers. It is usually $199, but free for our loyal readers. 🎁

This workshop has been taken by 1 Million people across the globe, who have been able to:

• Build business that make $10,000 by just using AI tools

• Make quick & smarter decisions using AI-led data insights

• Write emails, content & more in seconds using AI

• Solve complex problems, research 10x faster & save 16 hours every week

You’ll wish you knew about this FREE AI Training sooner (Btw, it’s rated at 9.8/10 ⭐)

Save your seat for $0 now! (Valid for 24 hours for 100 people only)

Meanwhile, elsewhere…

Extra Intrigue

In other worlds…

• Tech: Apple has announced it’ll add AI features to its Safari browser as it hustles to close the search gap with Google.

• Cinema: British environmentalist Sir David Attenborough just celebrated his 99th birthday by dropping a new film about our oceans.

• Business: China’s lead EV-maker BYD has backed out of a joint deal to build a lithium cathode plant in Chile (Santiago blames low lithium prices).

Perks with Intrigue!

Want to win one of 24 signed copies of In Praise of Idleness? It’s the acclaimed take on Bertrand Russell’s legendary essay, from international best-selling humourist and fellow Intriguer, Bradley Trevor Greive AM. Simply refer Intrigue to a couple of friends or frolleagues this month using your unique link below, and you’ll go in the draw!

Flag of the day

While Myanmar’s civil war and China’s vast South China Sea claims test ASEAN’s prestige (folks query the regional bloc’s effectiveness), at least the ASEAN flag rocks.

Adopted back in 1997, the Association of Southeast Asian Nations banner features 10 rice stalks (one for each member) all bound together in unity, within a red (courage and dynamism) and white (purity) circle atop a royal blue (peace and stability) background.

Intrigue’s rating: 9.8/10

Today’s poll

Yesterday’s poll: Do you think India and Pakistan are barrelling towards an all out war?

💥 Yes, it's already begun (43%)
🛡️ No, both sides know the stakes (55%)
✍️ Other (write in!) (2%)

Your two cents:

• 🛡️J.G: “Pakistan and India have been openly announcing retaliatory strikes. That’s a positive sign.”

• 💥 E.K.H: “Who's trying to stop it? Are they as loud and influential as the ones pushing it forward?”

• ✍️ R.C.O: “Both sides know the stakes, but domestic political considerations will make a de-escalation difficult.”