Putin seizes a 5th consecutive term in office


Just after 9pm last night (Sunday local time), Russia’s electoral authorities announced Russian President Vladimir Putin had been re-elected with ~88% of the vote, seizing his 5th consecutive term as Russia’s leader since 1999.

Assuming Putin (71) completes this next six-year term, he’ll eclipse Joseph Stalin’s 29 years to become Russia’s longest-serving leader in centuries (Nicholas I held power for 30 years from 1825).

So, what does all this mean? Putin, his supporters, and state-run media are declaring it a landslide display of national unity during wartime.

Elsewhere, it’s still seen as a sham due to various factors:

Candidates

Any remotely plausible opposition is now either disqualified (Boris Nadezhdin), exiled (Mikhail Kasyanov), jailed (Ilya Yashin), or dead (Alexei Navalny).

That’s left Putin running against three candidates who were either unheard of, or unelectable (the Communist Party candidate came a distant second with ~4%).

Campaigns

The three candidates who wereallowed to run against Putin… didn’t really run, offering no direct criticism of the man who’s been running Russia since 1999.

Meanwhile, leaked Kremlin documents obtained by Estonian outlet Delfi showed plans for a vast, $1B pro-Putin propaganda effort to boost his turnout.

Coverage

The result was a dull race, which might’ve been the point. Golos, the NGO that’s highly regarded in the West (and listed as a foreign agent in Russia), claims (🇷🇺) the limited state media coverage sought to ensure “citizens didn’t even know the elections were on”. And independent media has now mostly been muted.

Co-opting

Against that high-propaganda and low-interest backdrop, there were reports of state workers and others being bused into voting booths on Friday (which became a presidential election voting day for the first time this year).

Russia also ran ballots in Russian-occupied areas of Ukraine, where armed troops reportedly escorted electoral workers door-to-door to collect resident ballots.

So… beyond the obvious (hold onto power), what’s the point of all this?

Maintaining an electoral fig leaf offers a pressure valve for discontent and a way to blunt criticism from abroad, while still curating the end result.

At the same time, a ‘landslide’ allows Putin to send signals to allies and adversaries, both at home and abroad. At home, it aims to assure his elite backers (and discourage his critics) that Putin isn’t going anywhere. Abroad, the aim is to project unity and resolve against Ukraine and its Western partners, while stiffening the necks of new friends in Beijing, Pyongyang and Tehran.

But of course, there were other interesting signals this weekend, too.

First, there were multiple reported instances of arson and vandalism at booths, including by elderly women, and in crucial cities like Moscow and St Petersburg.

And second, there was the ‘noon against Putin‘ protest endorsed by Navalny shortly before his death – ie, encouraging folks to show their discontent by arriving at booths en masse at the same time (noon Sunday). On the day, there were indeed long queues at noon, despite earlier attempts at confusion, distraction, and intimidation.

So the net result of all this? Putin’s control still looks firm, though not as firm as he would like.

INTRIGUE’S TAKE

There’s an old Soviet-era joke about life as a worker back then: “we pretend to work, and they pretend to pay us“.

In an election where nobody is allowed to meaningfully challenge Putin, maybe we could update the joke: “we pretend to cast votes, and they pretend to count them“.

We offer reasons for this kind of stage-management above, but there’s a broader reason at play. Authoritarians claim very high levels of support for the same reason they deliver very long speeches: because they can.

Also worth noting:

  • Polling is tricky in Russia, though data from the Moscow-based Levada Center suggests Putin’s approval rating (unopposed) is now at ~80%, higher than before his full-scale invasion of Ukraine.
  • Boris Nadezhdin’s surprisingly anti-war candidacy generated some buzz before authorities disqualified him last month for alleged irregularities. He told media over the weekend he hadn’t voted for Putin, and encouraged others to follow suit. Brave guy.
Latest Author Articles
Pakistan and Afghanistan are taking up arms

Just as one war ended over the weekend, Pakistan and Afghanistan said “hold my chai“. You’ll recall we mentioned on Friday the epic Hollywood potential here, so we’ve channelled our inner Michael Bay for today’s briefing. Smell that? It’s popcorn, as we open with… Stay on top of your world from inside your inbox. Subscribe […]

13 October, 2025
Hamas and Israel accept peace plan

Now that Israel and Hamas have signed the first phase of President Trump’s peace plan for Gaza overnight, it’s worth a quick reflection on five ways this war has re-shaped our world, starting with… Much as we foreshadowed, the world has now spent two years watching in high-def as Israel’s response to the Hamas attacks […]

9 October, 2025
UNGA 2025: the spiciest themes

For an organisation at the very heart of international diplomacy, the UN makes precious few cameos in Hollywood. So to right that wrong (and spice things up), today’s wrap-up of this year’s UN General Assembly (UNGA) in New York features five quotes from the first feature film ever shot inside UN HQ, Nicole Kidman’s The […]

29 September, 2025
Why Japan’s PMs keep quitting

Japan’s 102nd prime minister (Shigeru Ishiba) announced his resignation Sunday night, joining a long and growing list of Tokyo’s short-lived leaders. So let’s take a quick look at why he quit, and why it matters. First, why’d Ishiba quit? Three reasons. Stay on top of your world from inside your inbox. Subscribe for free today […]

8 September, 2025