UK Supreme Court halts Rwanda refugee plan


The UK Supreme Court has shot down the government’s plan for certain asylum-seekers to be processed in Rwanda, labelling it “unlawful”.

We’ve read all 56 pages of the court’s decision so you don’t have to. The legalese gets complex in parts but, intriguingly, the judges delve into some of Rwanda’s recent history, including:

  • Rwanda’s “apparent failure” to uphold an earlier migration deal with Israel, and
  • at least 100 allegations of refoulement and threatened refoulement” (ie, forcibly returning people to a country where they’re at risk).

But the court says ultimately the issue isn’t “the good faith of the government of Rwanda at the political level, but its practical ability to fulfil its assurances.”

Domestically, the court’s decision caps an eventful few days for Downing Street (includinga shock cabinet reshuffle), and comes just as Prime Minister Sunak suits up for next year’s elections.

But regionally, the UK isn’t exactly an outlier. Irregular crossings through the Central Mediterranean have almost doubled this year, and more capitals are looking to third-country deals for an answer:

  • Italy recently announced it would build two migrant centres in Albania
  • Germany is examining the feasibility of its own Rwanda-style deal, and 
  • The EU and Tunisia are still working on their agreement from June.

And European supporters of this third-country approach have, in turn, long taken their inspiration from the other side of the world: Australia.

INTRIGUE’S TAKE

It’s hard to think of a more sensitive topic than migration, sitting right at the crossroads of national identity, state sovereignty, individual dignity, and international responsibility.

In that maelstrom, Sunak says he’ll rework his plan in order to address the court’s concerns. But anyone who’s familiar with Australia’s system (the model for the Rwanda deal) knows this is probably just the beginning.

Also worth noting:

  • Sunak’s vow to introduce emergency legislation came shortly after his Australian counterpart pledged his own urgent laws in response to a separate landmark court case on migration.
Latest Author Articles
The geopolitics of the next Dalai Lama

There’s nothing new about faith leaders holding political sway. But one such leader just caught our attention with his latest book published this week — specifically, the Dalai Lama mentions that his successor will be born outside China. First, a quick recap: the Dalai Lama (‘Ocean of Wisdom’) is the traditional religious and political leader of Tibetan Buddhism, which folks have […]

14 March, 2025
US-Ukraine talks produce ceasefire proposal

US and Ukrainian officials have just wrapped their peace talks in sunny Saudi Arabia, and we’re sure you’ve got questions, so let’s get into it. First, to clarify, these peace talks were about peace between Ukraine and its Russian occupiers, though you’d be forgiven (and arguably a little right) for assuming this was also about patching […]

12 March, 2025
The Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellite frenzy is here

We’re not a finance newsletter (we don’t own enough Patagucci vests to qualify), but we do enjoy scrolling through stock tickers.  That’s how we noticed some recent movements around Eutelsat, a Franco-British Low Earth orbit (LEO) satellite operator that’s in talks with the EU to ramp up its presence in Ukraine.  Over the past four days, the […]

7 March, 2025
Shots fired! The ‘Great Trade War’ is back

And so The Great Trade War™ is on. You’ve probably already heard endless hot takes from folks dressed in shirts with collars more rigid than your uncle Rob on the dance floor, so let’s keep this one short (and our collars in an effortless kind of linen ruffle). Here’s what you need to know. Trump’s […]

5 March, 2025