UN brings climate change to the World Court


Briefly: On Wednesday, the UN General Assembly agreed to seek an advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on countries’ obligations to address climate change. The resolution was put forward by the Pacific Island nation of Vanuatu.

Some 130 countries co-sponsored the resolution, which ended up passing without a vote – a small miracle, considering a) the US and China (the world’s top emitters) were notably ‘meh’ about the proposal, and b) the UN loves voting.

Vanuatu said China didn’t respond to a request to co-sponsor the resolution. For its part, the US said taking the matter to court “will likely accentuate disagreements”. But in the end, the two rivals found some rare (if uninspiring) common ground: they neither sponsored nor opposed the resolution.

It passed just weeks after Vanuatu was hit by two back-to-back cyclones, the severity of which the country’s leaders attributed to global warming. Vanuatu already has the highest disaster risk in the world.

The ICJ will now take up to 18 months to deliver its opinion, which will be highly influential but not legally binding.

Intrigue’s take: Wednesday’s news was the culmination of four years of campaigning led by Vanuatu. And it all started as an idea from law students at the University of the South Pacific in Fiji. So it’s hard not to cheer the David & Goliath angle.

But this win is also being celebrated across the entire Pacific Islands community, which has chafed at being seen as a mere prize in the US-China rivalry. The region has long identified climate as a top priority, and yet neither China nor the US backed Wednesday’s resolution. Something’s gotta give.

Also worth noting:

  • This isn’t the first time Vanuatu has played a lead role on climate issues: the UN’s COP27 climate summit last year agreed to create a loss and damage fund, which Vanuatu first proposed back in 1991.
  • The Pacific Island nations of Palau and the Marshall Islands attempted to pass a similar climate resolution at the UN in 2011.
Latest Author Articles
Trump’s Greenland threats aren’t empty

Exactly a year ago to the day we asked, “Why’s everyone talking about Greenland?”. That was when incoming Trump 2.0 had taken a blowtorch to global headlines by reviving the idea that acquiring Greenland (a semi-autonomous territory of fellow NATO-member Denmark) was “an absolute necessity” for the US.  A year later we’re still talking about […]

8 January, 2026
The Russian asset debate dividing Europe

On the first day of Christmas, my true love gave to me… $245B in frozen Russian assets.  It’s an unauthorised carol remix, but it cuts to the heart of a debate now splitting Europe. So here’s what you need to know.  Stay on top of your world from inside your inbox. Subscribe for free today […]

19 December, 2025
A spy chief’s dark outlook

Speeches are usually meant to congratulate, celebrate, or commemorate. Unless you’re the boss of Britain’s famed MI6 intelligence agency, Blaise Metreweli, who used her highly-anticipated speech on Monday to issue a pretty grim wake-up call. Here’s what she had to say… Stay on top of your world from inside your inbox. Subscribe for free today […]

17 December, 2025
Why a Belarusian dictator is involved in negotiations for Maduro’s departure

Two crucial but seemingly unconnected things happened this week: Now let’s connect some dots: Dot 1 – Tuesday 10 December: the US attorney-general publishes a video of US troops descending from a chopper onto an oil tanker, with a caption that they “executed a seizure warrant for a crude oil tanker used to transport sanctioned […]

12 December, 2025