US blames pro-Ukraine group for Nord Stream explosions


Briefly: Senior intelligence officials in the US and EU suspect a group of pro-Ukraine partisans is behind the blasts that damaged the Nord Stream pipelines last year. US officials say they don’t believe the Ukrainian government was behind the attacks. 

Some context: Late last September a series of blasts targeted the Nord Stream 1 and 2 pipelines, causing significant gas leaks in the Baltic Sea. The pipelines were built to transport natural gas from Russia to Europe. 

The blasts were clearly acts of sabotage, but mystery shrouded the ‘who’ and the ‘why’. The main suspects and their motives were:

  • Kyiv: to reduce Europe’s reliance on Russian gas, enabling Europe to back Kyiv 100% against Moscow
  • The US/UK: as above, plus leaving the EU gas market open for US exports
  • Moscow: adept at underwater skulduggery, but it was never clear why Russia would destroy its own revenue and leverage over Europe

Intrigue’s take: This controlled leak from US intelligence suggests Russia didn’t do it. So suspicion now shifts to the other suspects. And that’s huge. The slightest whiff of Ukrainian involvement risks angering Europe, particularly Germany, where millions of industrial jobs were long reliant on cheap Russian energy.  

So pinning the blame on a mystery ‘pro-Ukrainian group’ (but not Ukraine!) is a rather neat solution, reducing the risk of EU solidarity splintering. It’s just hard to see how a ‘group’ (rather than government) would have the capability to pull off such a complex operation.

The Cluedo continues.

Also worth noting: 

Latest Author Articles
Why Indonesians are looting their ministers’ homes

Well that escalated quickly. A residence belonging to Indonesia’s market darling of a finance minister (Sri Mulyani Indrawati) got ransacked outside Jakarta early yesterday (Sunday) morning. So let’s kick off the week with a quick but important question: what?! This all ✌️started✌️ last Monday, after local outlets reported all 580 members of Indonesia’s parliament are […]

1 September, 2025
The top 3 quotes from Jackson Hole

The Super Bowl for economists (aka the Jackson Hole Economic Policy Symposium) just wrapped on Saturday, so let’s get you the top three quotes, starting with… There’s always been tension in the Fed’s dual mandate of chasing maximum employment versus stable prices. But the chair suggested this tension now looks different. Why? He argued President […]

25 August, 2025
The Alaska summit: winners, losers and those in between

So Alaska ended much as we foreshadowed: no deal. But ‘no deal’ doesn’t mean ’empty-handed’. Here’s a quick tally of the ‘wins’ each side is now claiming (agree or not). Putin’s arguable wins fall into three categories: perception, isolation, and negotiation: On the perception front, Kremlin propagandists argue that in a single afternoon, Putin shrugged […]

18 August, 2025
The Trump-Putin summit: the view from Europe

When news broke that Presidents Trump and Putin were ironing out the details on an Alaska summit (likely at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson), Europe’s initial response was wtf.  But there’s no feeling of strategic exclusion that jumping on a quick Zoom call can’t fix, so that’s what President Trump did with his counterparts from Ukraine and […]

14 August, 2025