US report finds “significant” human rights issues in US partners including India, Taiwan


Briefly: The US State Department published its annual Human Rights Report on Monday, detailing the human rights situation in 198 countries and territories.

It features plenty of grim info on places like North KoreaRussiaIran, et al. And these days, that’s a bit like a newspaper announcing “Federal Agents Raid Gun Shop, Find Weapons” (amazingly, that headline is real).

But the annual Human Rights Report can also be notable in what it says about key US allies and partners. This year, examples include:

  • 🇹🇼Taiwan → Criminal libel laws mean a journalist could land in jail for “pointing out a fact… that injures the reputation of another”
  • 🇮🇳India → The lengthy list includes allegations of extrajudicial killings and even torture
  • 🇯🇵Japan → There were credible reports of violence or threats of violence targeting persons with disabilities and minority groups

Intrigue’s take: The annual US Human Rights Report is a neat illustration of the timeless ‘interests vs values’ dilemma: America’s values drive it to call out injustices, while its interests sometimes drive it to partner with the perpetrators.

How does the US resolve this dilemma? Its annual Human Rights Report calls out injustices, but in a way that doesn’t have to jeopardise core partnerships. Each year, US diplomats quietly emphasise that:

  • The annual Human Rights Report covers the entire world. Even the most annoyingly good country (New Zealand) gets a light rap on the knuckles, so the US isn’t really singling anyone out.
  • And Congress passed laws in the 1960s and 70s requiring these annual reports, so the State Department doesn’t really have a lot of choice.

Still, the report draws strong reactions every year: the President of Mexico called the State Department “liars” on Tuesday, as did China’s Foreign Ministry.

Meanwhile, we can see the same ‘interests vs values’ dilemma playing out in the White House: President Biden will co-host the second Summit for Democracy next week, but he still has to fist-bump the occasional autocrat along the way.

Also worth noting:

Latest Author Articles
Will Tulsi Gabbard be the next US spymaster?

Trump’s 2.0 cabinet picks were always going to be a source of intrigue, but none quite like Tulsi Gabbard, his nominee for Director of National Intelligence — it’s a job created after the September 2001 terrorist attacks to drive better intel oversight and coordination. Views on Gabbard range from American hero to Russian spy to […]

7 February, 2025
The kidnapping that’s rocked a region 

Imagine this: you’re slamming down that morning Pop-Tart® (frosted apple cinnamon, probably), when you get the call you’ve been waiting for — an opportunity to work on a dream project in Thailand. Your mind instantly runs wild with images of you absolutely chilling on a beach with a cocktail in hand (Sabai Sabai®, probably). Anyway, […]

5 February, 2025
Four global lessons from earnings week

Earnings calls used to be the exclusive domain of cigar-chomping capitalists, perhaps yelling “sell” at some quivering underling off-camera while an old-school ticker-tape hums. But we can confirm cigar-chomping diplomats also now follow this stuff — or should. If you’re willing to sift through the euphemisms and spin, these corporate events are full of insights into how […]

31 January, 2025
Something’s fishy under the Baltic Sea

We’ve long been debating when to brief you on the shenanigans under the Baltic Sea, but another single undersea cable getting severed is never quite enough to beat a dictator’s downfall, a new US president, or a Wall St meltdown. And that’s precisely the point of hybrid warfare: it’s about inflicting pain that’s never quite enough. Any damage to critical […]

29 January, 2025