Israel approves plan to capture and hold Gaza


After weeks of Israeli air strikes, ground raids, and blockades billed as pressure tactics to force Hamas to release the final 59 hostages, the Israeli security cabinet has unanimously approved a plan to expand back across Gaza. The details of this ‘Gideon’s Chariots’ directive remain fuzzy, but an Israeli official has told media it’ll include: 

  • the capture of the Strip and holding the territories
  • moving the Gazan population south for its defence
  • denying Hamas the ability to distribute humanitarian supplies”, and
  • powerful attacks against Hamas”.

Other reported details have emerged via media outlets, including:

  • The destruction of all northern tunnels, and any structures deemed a threat
  • The screening of civilians moved southwards (to filter out Hamas members), and  
  • A new Israeli-controlled aid delivery via private contractors (to prevent Hamas from diverting aid — it’s unclear if this would end Israel’s blockade since March).

So, what’s going on? Here are the main theories…

  • A negotiation tactic?

One senior Israeli official is telling outlets this plan won’t be implemented until after President Trump’s visit to the Middle East next week, calling it a “window of opportunity” for Hamas to release the hostages and agree to a new ceasefire.

Relatedly, Netanyahu might also be hoping to stoke Gazan unrest against Hamas, building on recent rare anti-Hamas protests across the strip.

But having survived the onslaught so far, and having crushed any dissent since it seized power in 2007, it’s hard to see why Hamas might change course now. To the contrary, Hamas remarks suggest some of the group’s leaders see casualties as tools to:

  • Increase global pressure on — and delegitimise — Israel, plus
  • Mobilise local support through resistance and martyrdom narratives.

Whatever it is, against the backdrop of Israel warning of an open-ended re-occupation of Gaza, Hamas officials have now declared there’s “no point in any negotiations“. 

  • A military tactic?

Bibi argues the plan will hasten the defeat of Hamas, with this ‘clear and hold’ strategy stopping Hamas from regrouping like it did last time. And that, he says, will hasten the release of the remaining 59 hostages (Israeli intelligence now believes only half are alive). 

But none of the hostage families are buying it; condemnation of the humanitarian cost continues; and Hamas’s big hostage release ceremonies (with military uniforms and arms) were a reminder of the difficulty of removing the group via military means alone.

So that’s led to claims this is nothing but… 

  • A political tactic 

This plan has emerged after months of continued Israeli protests and rising discontent towards Bibi’s government, so there’s an argument it could be:

  • distraction from economic woes and the backlash over his judicial reforms
  • deflection from criticism over the ceasefire’s collapse, and/or
  • protection against coalition instability, by throwing red meat to his ultra-nationalist allies (parts of the plan echo their rhetoric).

Or yes… maybe this plan is exactly what it says on the label, and even a step towards what Bibi’s hardliners now openly seek: the permanent re-occupation of Gaza.

Intrigue’s Take

If Israel proceeds with this plan, it’s not only heading down a perilous path with the Palestinians, but also potentially foreclosing other paths to a broader peace with its region. Rising players like the Saudis are already conditioning any recognition of Israel on Palestinian statehood, and that position will get wider and deeper as these wounds fester.

Israel’s isolation then risks becoming America’s isolation, given how many of the world’s ascendant players (including most of the BRICS and beyond) increasingly align their Israel-Palestinian advocacy with broader efforts to counter US influence. And that’s all playing out as US public sympathy for Israel hits 25-year lows (particularly among younger voters).

Maybe it’s hubris after his recent successes against Hezbollah and beyond, but history might show that Bibi is now flying way too close to the sun.

Sound even smarter:

  • The Israeli military already holds around one-third of Gaza.
  • Most Israelis supported moving onto the second phase of the ceasefire. 
Latest Author Articles
Does this US-Ukraine deal change anything?

Our Wednesday briefing on Trump’s first 100 days had barely cannon-balled into your inbox when the White House dropped a surprise: the Ukraine minerals deal was done.  The broad idea first emerged in President Zelensky’s victory plan last October. Dropping just a couple of weeks before Americans went to the polls, Zelensky’s strategy was: As Trump cruised […]

2 May, 2025
The world reloads its war chest

The Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) was born back in the 1960s, after Sweden’s then prime minister (who we imagine rocked a turtleneck) suggested establishing a new thinktank to commemorate the country’s 150 years of unbroken peace. And SIPRI has been absolutely pumping out reports ever since, but it’s really grabbed international attention in recent years, […]

1 May, 2025
100 days in: Trump’s foreign policy promises vs reality

Donald Trump promised to deliver “the most extraordinary first 100 days of any presidency”. Promise made, promise kept. Let’s whittle down President Trump’s many foreign policy promises to the four most consequential and take stock of where we are. 1. Rebalance trade (particularly with China) President Trump promised to reshape America’s trade relationship with the […]

30 April, 2025
The central bank war for independence

US stocks and the US dollar plunged again on Monday after the president colourfully called on Jerome Powell, the Fed Chair, to cut rates.  Anyway, while this monetary soap opera plays out on the world stage, it’s reignited a debate that everyone thought was resolved decades ago: the notion that central banks must be independent from politics.  Why? The […]

23 April, 2025