Israel will stay in Gaza for the long term


Israel will “have the overall security responsibility [in Gaza] for an indefinite period”, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Monday. Netanyahu’s announcement came as his defence minister said Israeli forces had “reached the heart of Gaza City” and were “tightening the noose.

Israel has been here before.In 1967, the IDF conquered the Gaza Strip and other adjacent territory (including the West Bank) during the Six-Day War. For the next several decades, Israel occupied and administered Gaza and around 9,000 Israeli citizens settled there.

Then in 2005, in an effort to forge peace with Palestinians following years of violence known as the Second Intifada, Israel unilaterally withdrew its forces from Gaza and forcefully evicted Israeli settlers in the area.

Back in the present, Netanyahu’s decision to assume ‘overall security responsibility’ in Gaza has seemed inevitable ever since his government announced it would launch a ground operation to “completely destroy Hamas”.

Responding to concerns that Israel would, in reality, be occupying Gaza, Mark Regev, a senior adviser to Prime Minister Netanyahu, said yesterday that “[t]here will have to be an Israeli security presence [in Gaza], but that doesn’t mean Israel is re-occupying Gaza, that doesn’t mean that Israel is there to govern the Gazans.

Intrigue’s take: It’s hard to square that circle. Israel will have few realistic alternatives after it achieves its war aims (and that remains an enormous if):

  1. It could try to give control of Gaza to the Palestinian National Authority while retaining a security presence (US Secretary of State Antony Blinken met with PNA president Mahmoud Abbas on Sunday, a sign the US is keeping all options open).
  2. It could create a new government in Gaza, though it’s not clear how.
  3. It could try to work with neighbouring Arab countries and the UN to install a multinational governing body with responsibility for Gaza.
  4. Or it could end up occupying Gaza indefinitely (an idea repugnant to almost all countries and many Israelis).

The initial political reaction to the Hamas attack has narrowed Israel’s medium and long-term options and now threatens to bog the country down in Gaza as it has been for much of its existence.

Also worth noting:

  • A former Egyptian diplomat, Abderahman Salaheldin, proposed forming a multinational force “for a transitional period of two years until a Palestinian police force from the Gaza Strip is formed, trained, and equipped to assume the tasks of maintaining security.”
  • John Kirby, a White House spokesperson, reiterated President Biden’s concerns to CNN “that a reoccupation of Gaza by Israeli forces is not good”. 
Latest Author Articles
What our leaders fear most

The World Economic Forum (WEF) crams epic wealth and power into the tiny Swiss ski resort of Davos each January, leaving it open to some truly cracking conspiracy theories — personally as Simpsons fans, we love to imagine Davos rigging every Oscars night. But we’ve been to Davos before (and will be back again from Monday), […]

17 January, 2025
The new rules that could upend AI

Just when you think Joe Biden is wrapping things up, he announces updated export controls on AI chips that’ve sent US tech giants into a tizzy.  Let’s dive in.  The new rules, sexily named the Regulatory Framework for the Responsible Diffusion of Advanced Artificial Intelligence Technology 💘, divide countries into three categories:  Stay on top of your world from inside your […]

15 January, 2025
Why China wants you to buy a new microwave

As clickbaity as it sounds, we’re not making the above title up.  On Wednesday, China’s policymakers announced they’ve added all sorts of small electronic appliances — microwaves, rice cookers, water purifiers — to a list of consumer products eligible for a subsidised trade-in. We’re not here to dunk on that idea — the US and others have […]

10 January, 2025
Why’s everyone talking about Greenland? 

When a quiet and distant land suddenly starts popping up on the front pages of international newspapers, it’s often one of three things: i) it’s won a sporting tournament, ii) there’s been some sort of disaster, or iii) someone important is talking about it. Greenland now falls into category three, though Trump critics might suggest […]

8 January, 2025