Why did China just agree to work with the US on fentanyl?


It’s not often we get to cover a positive story these days, particularly when it comes to the veritable dumpster fire that is US-China relations.

But yesterday (Wednesday), the White House made an announcement that left us feeling just a little warm and fuzzy – like, 0.000001% warm and 0.000002% fuzzy: China has agreed to subject three key China-made precursor chemicals used in the manufacturing of fentanyl to “additional regulation and control”.

National Security Council spokesperson Sean Savett even called it a “valuable step forward”.

Fentanyl?

Our US readers will know that fentanyl is a synthetic opioid that’s:

  • Ultra-potent (80 to 100 times more-so than morphine) and
  • Ultra-low-cost (the folks at Reuters found they could make three million pills – worth $3M – using an internet connection and $3k).

Fentanyl has had a legitimate pain relief role for decades, but its potency and cost have now enabled the drug to wreak havoc across the US, in two ways:

  • First in terms of public health, driving 100,000 overdose deaths per year, and
  • Second in terms of national security, with organised crime thriving off its ability to supply the US market.

So… the US has long been struggling to stem the flow.

And what’s this got to do with China?

A lot of the finished product used to enter the US from China, until Beijing slapped a wide-ranging ban on the drug and its variants in 2019.

The ban ‘worked’ in slashing the amount of China-made fentanyl smuggled into the US, but organised crime did what it always does: it pivoted. So instead of importing the finished product, it imported the ingredients (precursors).

And most of those precursor chemicals are made in China then shipped to labs in Mexico, where syndicates synthesise them into fentanyl and smuggle them into the US via illicit established channels.

The very nature of fentanyl makes this supply chain hard to stop: the entire annual US supply could reportedly fit in the back of a couple of Ford F-150s.

So… will this new US-China pact work?

We started this piece feeling all warm and fuzzy, but it’s a liiiiittle harder to end it that way. Here’s why: 

  • Many of fentanyl’s precursor chemicals are legit inputs for perfumes, dyes, rubbers, and insecticides, so an outright ban isn’t viable
  • The criminal supply chain can also just tweak the chemical structure of any key restricted substances to evade specific bans, and
  • The transnational nature of the supply chain means it’s often a criminal result built on lots of legal steps, making it hard to prosecute.

So you can bet organised crime will again pivot. But honestly? That’s the cat-and-mouse story of tackling organised crime: it’s a path rather than a destination.

And in the meantime, we’ll print out the White House’s US-China announcement and just nuzzle into it, breathing in its musk, all as a reminder that even staunch rivals can – and must – still find a way to work together.

INTRIGUE’S TAKE

Of course, this all begs the question… why did China agree to place restrictions on its own vast and highly-lucrative chemicals industry, to help a rival like the US deal with its own drug problem?

We have a few theories:

First, this was all imposing a reputational cost on China, particularly among US lawmakers who will shape America’s evolving response on issues where China can really feel pain (like China’s access to US markets and tech).

Second, the issue had already evolved beyond just US-China ties in 2022, when a top UN narcotics body added key fentanyl precursors to its list of substances that all members (including China) must now regulate.

And third, we’ve written before about how Xi Jinping has a real incentive to tactically stabilise ties with the US while he seeks to grapple with the growing list of economic (and therefore political) challenges he’s facing back home.

All three above probably played a role in Beijing’s decision to play ball, and all arguably offer insights for anyone hoping to shape China’s choices ahead.

Also worth noting:

Latest Author Articles
Israel approves plan to capture and hold Gaza

After weeks of Israeli air strikes, ground raids, and blockades billed as pressure tactics to force Hamas to release the final 59 hostages, the Israeli security cabinet has unanimously approved a plan to expand back across Gaza. The details of this ‘Gideon’s Chariots’ directive remain fuzzy, but an Israeli official has told media it’ll include:  […]

7 May, 2025
Does this US-Ukraine deal change anything?

Our Wednesday briefing on Trump’s first 100 days had barely cannon-balled into your inbox when the White House dropped a surprise: the Ukraine minerals deal was done.  The broad idea first emerged in President Zelensky’s victory plan last October. Dropping just a couple of weeks before Americans went to the polls, Zelensky’s strategy was: As Trump cruised […]

2 May, 2025
The world reloads its war chest

The Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) was born back in the 1960s, after Sweden’s then prime minister (who we imagine rocked a turtleneck) suggested establishing a new thinktank to commemorate the country’s 150 years of unbroken peace. And SIPRI has been absolutely pumping out reports ever since, but it’s really grabbed international attention in recent years, […]

1 May, 2025
100 days in: Trump’s foreign policy promises vs reality

Donald Trump promised to deliver “the most extraordinary first 100 days of any presidency”. Promise made, promise kept. Let’s whittle down President Trump’s many foreign policy promises to the four most consequential and take stock of where we are. 1. Rebalance trade (particularly with China) President Trump promised to reshape America’s trade relationship with the […]

30 April, 2025