The US goes all in on Intel with $20B package


Washington has awarded US chipmaker Intel up to $8.5B in grants and $11B in loans to lift local semiconductor output. The package, announced yesterday (Wednesday), is the biggest yet under America’s 2022 CHIPS and Science Act.

The idea is to help drive Intel’s $100B plan for new, expanded, and modernised chip foundries (‘fabs’) across Arizona, Ohio, New Mexico, and Oregon.

Why?

While the US still dominates chip design, manufacturing has gradually shifted to Asia – particularly to Taiwan’s TSMC (for advanced chips) and Korea’s Samsung.

And it’s been a wild ride for Intel, which was once the world’s largest chipmaker before it started missing opportunities (like mobile and AI chips) while losing its fab edge. It’s now worth just $180B, versus $600B at TSMC and $2.2T at Nvidia.

So by reversing Intel’s decline, the US hopes to help rebuild the country’s chip manufacturing capabilities and:

  • Retain its edge on a tech with massive economic and military implications
  • Reduce its reliance on (and vulnerability to) overseas manufacturers
  • Back its own ability to curb China’s access to advanced chips, and
  • Continue to revive US manufacturing (which also helps in an election year)

As US Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo put it: “We rely on a very small number of factories in Asia for all of our most sophisticated chips, […] That’s untenable and unacceptable. It’s an economic security problem, it’s a national security problem, and we’re going to change that.”

So then why back Intel, specifically?

Intel was always going to be a winner from the Chips Act, not because everyone loves Intel, but because it’s the only major US player that retained a manufacturing capability rather than (like Nvidia and AMD) outsource it to Asia.

So will this work?

Semiconductors are arguably the most advanced tech that humans have ever made, and folks lucky enough to visit fabs in Taiwan tend to stagger out afterwards, stunned. So this stuff is hard to manufacture, and the US is behind.

Let’s crunch some numbers (the smaller the size, the more advanced the chip): back in 2006, Intel was the first to make 45 nanometre chips, but it then struggled for years to progress beyond 14nm before hitting today’s 10nm. Meanwhile, China surprised everyone last year with a 7nm chip, and TSMC is already selling 3nm chips.

So it’s not just a matter of building a fab in the US and churning out chips. Ask TSMC, which has struggled building a first 4nm plant in Arizona, partly due to:

  • High costs
  • A lack of nearby suppliers
  • Differences in work culture
  • A gap in specialised labour, and
  • Lags in dishing out Chips Act funds.

As a US company, Intel may not need to learn all these same lessons the hard way, but others are more structural – e.g., very few folks in the world know how to install the Dutch extreme ultraviolet lithography machines needed in a fab.

And it’s those kinds of structural barriers that explain why, just as it took decades for the US to lose its edge, it might take another while to claw it all back.

INTRIGUE’S TAKE

Sometimes world history looks like a straight path, while other times it looks like a pendulum swinging back and forth through the centuries.

This feels more like a pendulum day, with at least two big ones swinging right through this semiconductor story:

  • 1️⃣ Industrial policy: the first English reference to capitalism was potentially in Alexander Hamilton’s 1791 vision for a government-led shift to a manufacturing economy. The pendulum then swung away from government intervention last century, and now it’s swung back again with the Chips Act and other forms of industrial policy.
  • 2️⃣ Foreign policy: the US has historically lurched between periods of wanting to venture out to slay foes, and other periods of wanting to hunker down and pull up the drawbridge. Reviving its home chipmaking is another possible sign the US is hunkering back down.

Both pendulums (or ‘pendula’ 🤓) look to us like a response to the same thing: a world that’s appearing less friendly to the US.

Also worth noting:

  • Separately, the US is investing $3.5B in a little-known ‘secure enclave’ program for Intel to produce military and intelligence chips.
  • Taiwan accounts for 90% of the world’s production of the most advanced chips.
Latest Author Articles
The US and Iran are back on the brink

The weekend is rolling around, which in recent times has meant one of two things: a) Sabrina Carpenter is about to unveil her latest brand collab, or b) the US is about to launch its latest daring military operation. As much as we’re keen to explore Sabrina’s Pringle-scented Redken hair mist and Dunkin’ x Prada […]

20 February, 2026
The massive supply chain shortage you didn’t know about

You’d think 2026 already had enough on, but no — someone has gone out and helpfully coined an entirely new genre of Armageddon: not nuclear, not biblical, but supply chain: So what’s driving this impending RAMageddon? Intrigue’s hard-core nerds will forgive us when we casually split chips into three families: Stay on top of your […]

18 February, 2026
The country on the verge of three different wars

Think you’re busy? Wait ‘til you meet Ethiopia’s Abiy Ahmed Ali (above), who’s now juggling three separate and interrelated conflicts, starting with…  This one’s got more backstory than Carrie and Mr Big, but basically Ethiopia’s 1962 annexation of its neighbour triggered Eritrea’s brutal 30-year war for independence, which eventually plunged Ethiopia back into its current […]

11 February, 2026
Trump sets his sights on Cuba

There’s a real Netflix energy to geopolitics coverage right now — Maduro gets yeeted, and within hours everyone is frothing over season two (Cuba). So… is Cuba next? Let’s find out. In the spirit of casually summarising seven decades of US-Cuba history in a paragraph already part-wasted on throat-clearing, the TLDR is there’s been bad […]

10 February, 2026